Larger text, stronger contrast and one column for easier reading.Standard display enabled.

Questions, mechanisms, and their consequences

Research

My research asks how markets and financing shape the effects of public policy. My current projects focus on illegal mining, climate policy and investment. I am interested in where policies fall short of their aims, and what might help them work better.

The papers below set out the questions, models and findings. Their conclusions depend on the assumptions stated in each study. Full papers are available where indicated; other projects are shared through their abstracts.

01

Illegal mining · Market design

For a Fistful of Gold

Elies Lucio · · Working paper·Illegal mining · Market design

Why can restrictions on mineral buyers fail to reduce illegal mining? This paper studies how control over mineral sales and essential imports can keep households mining, even when their returns fall. It examines when verifying origin at extraction can change these incentives.

Abstract

I develop a theory of how the organization of local markets shapes the effects of supply-chain regulation on illegal mining. An armed intermediary buys gold from households and sells them essential imports. What it pays for gold, it recovers through import margins. Households must cover their subsistence needs. Falling returns can make them mine more, not less. Downstream, laundering, unregulated buyers, and retention give the intermediary ways around restrictions. Restrictions can therefore change sales and receipts without changing extraction. Imperfect certification instead separates certified from unverified gold. This raises the profitability and fiscal value of legal mining. Once funded, clean innovation expands legal opportunities and the prospective tax base. Authorities who profit from illegal mining then find intervention optimal once the fiscal value of legal mining is high enough. This holds even though intervention is costly, may fail, and can be postponed. With livelihoods financed and production safe, illegal mining can end

Citation: Elies Lucio. For a Fistful of Gold. 2026.

Read the paper ↗ PDF · in English
Explore the project ↗
02

Climate policy · Investment finance

The Brown Side of Carbon Markets

Elies Lucio · · Working paper·Climate policy · Investment finance

A carbon price affects both production and access to finance. Emissions allowances can serve as loan collateral, so their value may change what a firm can invest. This paper studies how uncertainty, financial constraints and payment timing affect the choice between a carbon tax, a tradable emissions cap and a price range with a floor and ceiling. The numerical comparisons illustrate the model; they are not estimates for a particular country.

Abstract

A carbon price changes both the return to emitting and the value of an emissions allowance used as collateral. We study how these two channels affect the design of carbon taxes, tradable emissions caps and price collars, which set a price floor and ceiling.

Under jointly concave production, investment can complement or substitute for emissions. After optimising investment, firms differ in how they value emissions. We derive an exact welfare comparison between price and quantity instruments, governed by curvature and the covariance of shocks. Production complementarity alone does not determine the preferred instrument. For finite uncertainty, the globally optimal price collar can be found through a finite set of convex quadratic programmes.

We then allow firms to finance investment before receiving operating revenue. A higher carbon price can increase investment by raising collateral value, even when the direct incentive effect points the other way. Financing thresholds and a cash-equivalence result show when the share of allowances sold at auction and the timing of transfers affect real decisions. A reproducible example of joint policy design shows how the preferred revenue rule changes when public bridge finance is available. Forest conversion and Brazilian institutions identify possible applications and the data needed to assess the model.

Citation: Elies Lucio. Carbon Market Design When Production and Finance Interact: Taxes, Tradable Caps, and Price Collars. 2026.

Abstract available
03

Connected carbon markets · Technological catch-up

Carbon Market Integration and Green Catch-up

Elies Lucio · · Working paper·Connected carbon markets · Technological catch-up

Can selling unused emissions allowances help firms invest in cleaner technology? This paper studies when connecting carbon markets can support industrial catch-up. It distinguishes the incentive created by the carbon price, the value of initially allocated allowances and the money received from later sales. Depending on the conditions, extra income can also finance more polluting production.

Abstract

A shared carbon market gives a firm in the South a buyer for emissions allowances it does not use. This opportunity changes the return to clean investment and, once sales are paid, the funds available to finance it. We develop a North–South investment model in which firms own emissions rights, the North advances technology and the South chooses whether to adopt cleaner or more polluting technology.

Current production and allowance prices are determined together. Firms choose investment and how much profit to retain, subject to receiving cash after investment has been paid for. We identify when cleaner production frees allowances for sale, when additional exports raise revenue despite a lower allowance price, and when Southern productivity catches up with an advancing Northern technology frontier.

A fully solved finite investment economy shows that connecting markets can increase both Southern clean productivity and the speed of relative catch-up. Under separate markets, the same cash injection instead finances polluting investment. Other parameter choices can also direct extra trading income towards polluting production. The findings are therefore conditional: the price incentive, rents from initially allocated emissions rights and later sale proceeds need to be understood separately.

Citation: Elies Lucio. Carbon Market Integration and Green Catch-up. 2026.

Abstract available
04

Integral Economics · Information · Venture finance · International portfolios

Das Kapital: Investment Strikes Back

Elies Lucio and Hugues Pouget · · Research in progress·Integral Economics · Information · Venture finance · International portfolios

This project brings together the three levels of Integral Economics. It asks how information and successive rounds of financing shape individual ventures, the allocation of venture capital and international investment. The work is developed with Hugues Pouget and remains in progress.

Abstract

Integral Economics is a research programme developed with Hugues Pouget around Das Kapital: Investment Strikes Back. It studies how information and financing within ventures affect the allocation of venture capital, and how the resulting ownership, financial claims and cash flows enter international portfolios.

The programme connects three levels: individual decisions about information and finance; the search between ventures and investors; and economy-wide portfolios, prices and international accounts. The links work in both directions. Investment decisions shape the wider economy, while prices and funding opportunities influence individual choices. The aim is to bring these mechanisms into a common framework. The programme remains work in progress.

Citation: Elies Lucio and Hugues Pouget. Das Kapital: Investment Strikes Back. 2026.

Abstract available